The NFL is cracking down on taunting just one season after allowing players to participate in touchdown celebrations. With the new rule in place, let’s take a look as to what lead members of the NFL’s competition committee to a decision to crack down on what they’re calling “taunting”.
In a report posted earlier this week by Yahoo Sports contributor Charles Robinson, he cites that the members of the committee agreed to crack down largely in thanks to Kansas City Chiefs wideout Tyreek Hill for back-flips in the endzone and throwing up “deuces” to the opposing team’s defenders on his way to the endzone.
According to two league sources familiar with the committee’s conversations, those gestures sparked conversations last season after the wideout performed flips when entering the endzone during the Chiefs’ Week 12 matchup against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, followed by another one in Week 13 vs the Denver Broncos, which was nationally televised.
According to one of those sources he stated, “[The backflips], when you’re watching that and the gesturing, it’s not a part of a touchdown celebration.” He then followed it up by speaking in regards to the incident during Super Bowl LV involving Hill and Bucs’ safety Antoine Winfield Jr. — which resulted in a penalty followed by a monetary fine. “It’s obviously taunting. It’s purposely being disrespectful, and you saw in the Super Bowl where it came back. A guy retaliates because he saw that it was being disrespectful, and then now he’s getting him back.”
During the post-game press conference, Winfield Jr. admitted to it being “taunting” as a form of retaliation for Hill’s antics during both team’s Week 12 matchup previously mentioned. “The taunting, man, it’s something I had to do,” Winfield told reporters. “When we played them earlier [in the season], Hill went off on us. He backflipped right in front of my face and gave me the peace sign. So it was only right that I gave him the peace sign right back to him. It felt amazing to be able to do that.”
So was it Hill’s antics that made the committee begin working on something, or did Winfield Jr.’s retaliation ultimately force their hand? Considering Hill was never penalized nor fined, but the latter, which was donated to charity, it’s hard to argue that maybe the Super Bowl incident made the committee look into even the playing field.
If Winfield Jr. never returned the favor eight weeks after the humiliation, would the committee had cracked down, or would it had continued to be swept under the rug? Regardless, it was only fitting that the gesture was returned on the very field that the shenanigans had started on by the very player whom it was directed at.